Flamingo used to be a hero, right? Before they carved up his brain and made him a monster? Did we ever see him as a hero, or was he introduced with that backstory already in place?
I really doubt #3. Reasonably sure the Cat of Size-Shifting Hannibal Gordon introduced back in Mz. Simone's Batgirl is still around. Batgirl just needs somebody to make sure it doesn't go full giant and start going on a rampage.
That was my initial reading, but looking at it again, she seems to be holding something in the panel where asks "What if there was... more?" Can't really tell what it is- maybe a list of great restaurants that've opened in Gotham since he left?
that has implications of the Tim/Cassie/Connor relationship... i found it... creepy... but also... sexy... if that makes sense.... Tim dating Cassie because he missed connor... i mean... it wans't even subtle
Hm, didn't they retcon Kori's relationship with Jason recently to him telling everyone he'd slept with her, only for her to say that it actually wasn't true?
Kinda makes Jason a dick, though of a different sort.
Man, that was an awesome showing of Steph's skills. Being someone who's heard a lot of people asking for her to show up but not really familiar with the character herself, I can see now why people wanted her back so bad.
And the scenes between Barbara and Jason were amazing. They should hang out together more often. Although I find it funny that Jason felt like he had to show off to Babs by jumping off the bridge into a sweet alien spaceship. Wonder how long he had Starfire waiting under the bridge for him to make his dramatic exit.
Ok glad to see Flamingo pack. Actually like that villain. But umm.. .the hell with Jason and Barbara? That is...stupid... please let's not entertain that ship. Allow them to work together as a team sure and build on the family dynamic that the Batfamily should have, but other than that.. just no.
Agreed several hundred percent. Any of the Batman spinoffs getting romantic with another just feels kind of wrong. Especially Batgirl and Red Hood, neither of whom really seem like they'd be healthy or happy together with any kind of believability.
Actually, Red Hood doesn't seem like he'd be a good partner to any halfways "ordinary" person. Even Starfire, with her all-you-need-is-love styles, seems like a weird lady-friend for somebody as twisted and bitter and brutal as Red Hood shows himself to be.
Though I must say, some kind of weird semi-affection makes much more sense with the FIVE YEARS edict than in the older continuity, where Red Hood and Batgirl-Oracle were far, far older and much, much more different.
Considering Jason's issues (which granted do seem less intense in the nu52), I don't really think he's really cut out for any sort of healthy relationship.
Well, the bat-family uses climbing ropes that have a fair bit of give in them for just that reason (see Batgirl: Year One, from a few years ago). I'd guess there's less elasticity in Spidey's weblines, and he just makes up the difference with his super strength/durability. It only really makes a difference in cases like Gwen's.
IIRC, its acknowledged that the main reason why Gwen was killed was the lack of give in his webbing, so Peter later altered the webbing so that it would have more elasticity specifically so it doesn't happen again.
Huh the Bat tracker is still a thing? That concept was started by Gail Simone in Batgirl right? I wonder if this means that Hugo Strange still created it?
Yep, final arc pre-New 52 Supergirl had that. But the Bat Tracker to which Stephanie describes began in Batgirl #4 or #5 with Babs saying Hugo Strange created an app so criminals could track Batman.
Back in his original version as a PI, Jason Bard was a war veteran who had a limp and used a cane because he was injured in the line of duty... I suspect he will now get the limp and cane because of what Jason and Barbara just did to him.
Jason and Barbara? Not a fan
Flamingo... another nobody I could live wthout seeing again. Does Batman REALLY need another villain whose sole gimmick is murder-death-kill?
Totally agree regarding Flamingo. The only cool thing about the character was that initial Quitely cover and what it was referencing. I get that Morrison was trying to generate a parallel to Jason (as if there weren't enough), but any villain with what I thought was a half-decent visual and a Purple Rain reference deserved way better than just 'evil murdery person'.
...A parallel to Jason (as if there weren't enough)
Enough? Wait, who else? Batman I know has too many parallels - Dr. Hurt, The Wrath, Owlman, Thomas Wayne Jr., Hush, and then the Arkham Knight, plus arguably every single villain in his Rogues Gallery, but a parallel to Jason? I can't for the life of me remember anyone else right now.
What I meant to say is 'as if there weren't enough Morrison could have used already'. Like I didn't see the point in making an entirely new character when Morrison could have just adjusted an older one. My main point is that promising visual of a character who gets a freaking Purple Rain reference as a cover shouldn't have just been a voiceless, evil-murdery-stabby person as yet another part of Morrison's commentary on anti-heroes like the one he'd gone and adjusted Jason into being.
Okay, given the lack of any real ostentatious, loud, silly, campy stuff from the Joker for a while and the fact he's basically been nothing but a dull killer since DKR/TKJ, why couldn't we have a had a loud, tacky, overly flamboyant madman with some real character? Like some sort of adjustment of the BTAS Joker, who now reads as entirely unlike the contemporary Joker, with some mad schemes, some deathtraps? Or some art obsessed madman, a riff on the Nicholson!Joker of Batman '89 or something like Sander Cohen of Bioshock? If he's going to kill people, do something interesting with it, something weird and lurid like, I don't know, he has a demented obsession with making people do the one-legged standing pose like the actual bird (which would be, say, a parallel with the pretty unnerving rabbit masks during that particular section of Bioshock). Hell, maybe he doesn't even need to kill them to do that, maybe he forces people to stand like that or they set off some manner of booby trap. You could even go places with the Prince reference from the Quitely cover.
Anything would have been more promising than 'oh, he doesn't talk, he has no real character because he was lobotomised, but he eats people's faces after killing them'. Because as much as he was progressing the Batman formula at the time, Grant's villains seemed to attempt to do the same, but their reasons for being are either trite or cliche (Flamingo) or Grant was being too clever for his own good and thinking we couldn't dig up the references on our own (Pyg).
They did have the Son of Man before the pre-reboot (art-obsessed super-villain), but I guess this new Flamingo could work as an American version, or something. Holy crap, like a good handful of BioShock's villains could pass as Batman Rogues.
Anyway, I didn't have the same strong aversion to villains murdering as you (and I still don't), and I remain a fan of Morrison's B&R, but I like that you at least offered some alternatives, and some decent ones at that.
P.S. Heh. You're really P.O'd about that Prince reference, aren't you?
I think Ryan himself could be the only villain who wouldn't actually work, somehow, given he's incredibly isolationist and likely wouldn't pose that much of a threat to Gotham. Lamb, on the other hand? A creepy, cult-based 'Family'-espousing villain who treats her own daughter like dirt could be a good parallel to Batman himself. Cohen speaks for himself, as does Fontaine, really. It'd make for an interesting crossover.
And that's fair enough - I'm just of the mind that a lot of the time, the MO of various villains these days is to just kill people, and increasingly gory/shocking ways. But I'm not saying some of those villains don't work (and I do, for instance, enjoy the current Joker stories under Snyder), I'd just like to see an alternative.
And you cannot tell me that it's a wasted opportunity. That cover makes the villain look cool. And he's dressed in freaking bubblegum pink. BUGGLEGUM PINK.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 11:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 11:11 pm (UTC)2) Jason Todd, unlikely voice of reason...
3) Was Barbara hitting on Jason?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-18 11:51 pm (UTC)2) "I'm not Dick Grayson...but I hang out with his ex-girlfriend"
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-22 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 10:47 pm (UTC)Kinda makes Jason a dick, though of a different sort.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-22 03:46 pm (UTC)i don't know... if they were retconning the sex, did they have to do it at Jason's expense?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:13 am (UTC)And the scenes between Barbara and Jason were amazing. They should hang out together more often. Although I find it funny that Jason felt like he had to show off to Babs by jumping off the bridge into a sweet alien spaceship. Wonder how long he had Starfire waiting under the bridge for him to make his dramatic exit.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:52 am (UTC)Actually, Red Hood doesn't seem like he'd be a good partner to any halfways "ordinary" person. Even Starfire, with her all-you-need-is-love styles, seems like a weird lady-friend for somebody as twisted and bitter and brutal as Red Hood shows himself to be.
Though I must say, some kind of weird semi-affection makes much more sense with the FIVE YEARS edict than in the older continuity, where Red Hood and Batgirl-Oracle were far, far older and much, much more different.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 03:19 am (UTC)Sadly, this might be the case. It reminds me of John Watson from Sherlock, who's into the dangerous type, consciously or otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 07:47 pm (UTC)You mean aside from the psychotic industrialist who threw her off a bridge?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 09:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 11:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 09:27 am (UTC)Jason and Barbara? Not a fan
Flamingo... another nobody I could live wthout seeing again. Does Batman REALLY need another villain whose sole gimmick is murder-death-kill?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-19 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 04:01 am (UTC)Enough? Wait, who else? Batman I know has too many parallels - Dr. Hurt, The Wrath, Owlman, Thomas Wayne Jr., Hush, and then the Arkham Knight, plus arguably every single villain in his Rogues Gallery, but a parallel to Jason? I can't for the life of me remember anyone else right now.
Scorn? Is it Scorn? Am I right?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 05:36 am (UTC)P.S. I've heard enough about what you don't want Flamingo to be. Out of curiosity, what would you have had him be?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 05:55 am (UTC)Okay, given the lack of any real ostentatious, loud, silly, campy stuff from the Joker for a while and the fact he's basically been nothing but a dull killer since DKR/TKJ, why couldn't we have a had a loud, tacky, overly flamboyant madman with some real character? Like some sort of adjustment of the BTAS Joker, who now reads as entirely unlike the contemporary Joker, with some mad schemes, some deathtraps? Or some art obsessed madman, a riff on the Nicholson!Joker of Batman '89 or something like Sander Cohen of Bioshock? If he's going to kill people, do something interesting with it, something weird and lurid like, I don't know, he has a demented obsession with making people do the one-legged standing pose like the actual bird (which would be, say, a parallel with the pretty unnerving rabbit masks during that particular section of Bioshock). Hell, maybe he doesn't even need to kill them to do that, maybe he forces people to stand like that or they set off some manner of booby trap. You could even go places with the Prince reference from the Quitely cover.
Anything would have been more promising than 'oh, he doesn't talk, he has no real character because he was lobotomised, but he eats people's faces after killing them'. Because as much as he was progressing the Batman formula at the time, Grant's villains seemed to attempt to do the same, but their reasons for being are either trite or cliche (Flamingo) or Grant was being too clever for his own good and thinking we couldn't dig up the references on our own (Pyg).
no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 06:15 am (UTC)FUCKING SOLD.
They did have the Son of Man before the pre-reboot (art-obsessed super-villain), but I guess this new Flamingo could work as an American version, or something. Holy crap, like a good handful of BioShock's villains could pass as Batman Rogues.
Anyway, I didn't have the same strong aversion to villains murdering as you (and I still don't), and I remain a fan of Morrison's B&R, but I like that you at least offered some alternatives, and some decent ones at that.
P.S. Heh. You're really P.O'd about that Prince reference, aren't you?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-20 06:27 am (UTC)And that's fair enough - I'm just of the mind that a lot of the time, the MO of various villains these days is to just kill people, and increasingly gory/shocking ways. But I'm not saying some of those villains don't work (and I do, for instance, enjoy the current Joker stories under Snyder), I'd just like to see an alternative.
And you cannot tell me that it's a wasted opportunity. That cover makes the villain look cool. And he's dressed in freaking bubblegum pink. BUGGLEGUM PINK.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-21 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-22 03:52 pm (UTC)also i love batman's O_O face when he reads the letter . and can ijust say, i love Stephanie.