Fair enough, and I think it was Gaiman himself who wrote an elegy for another lighter, sillier age of Batman with Riddler remarkingly disbelievingly that Joker's killing people now, and asking when it all stopped being fun.
He just passes peacefully. He holds out until his body has no more to give. In some way or another, always fighting to keep going, until he can't.
And in that final moment, he finds peace.
He finds peace in knowing that while his battle continues on, he'll be able to keep fighting it through his trained successor in Terry. And that his legacy as Batman lives on, beyond his time in this world.
FIrst time reading this, I somehow missed how much this feels like "The Wake," arguably Gaiman's greatest single achievement (who else created a top-selling hero for DC Comics and also got to end their story?). As in "The Wake," there's the sense of a splintered community of people who have nothing in common but the deceased, and as in "The Wake," the principal figure is dead and immortal at the same time.
I have griped about other stories that seem to conclude with "Ain't it great how the big characters will get rebooted forever?" and this story does flirt with being that towards its end. The difference is that Gaiman does have a profound thing or two to say about Batman--his indomitable spirit, his endless commitment/compulsion, shaping the lives of everyone around him, including his own. Gaiman at once recognizes that being Batman is a childish notion and that there's something sublime about it. "Your only reward for being Batman? You get to be Batman." Not Gaiman's best, for sure, but a worthy addition to his resume.
Founded by girl geeks and members of the slash fandom, scans_daily strives to provide an atmosphere which is LGBTQ-friendly, anti-racist, anti-ableist, woman-friendly and otherwise discrimination and harassment free.
Bottom line: If slash, feminism or anti-oppressive practice makes you react negatively, scans_daily is probably not for you.
no subject
Date: 2024-05-13 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-05-13 09:16 am (UTC)The Adam West ones do.
no subject
Date: 2024-05-14 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-05-13 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-05-14 02:27 am (UTC)Batman Beyond era, natch.
He just passes peacefully. He holds out until his body has no more to give. In some way or another, always fighting to keep going, until he can't.
And in that final moment, he finds peace.
He finds peace in knowing that while his battle continues on, he'll be able to keep fighting it through his trained successor in Terry. And that his legacy as Batman lives on, beyond his time in this world.
no subject
Date: 2024-05-14 02:30 am (UTC)Superman's final reward after his "death" is a chance to finally start a life with Lois and to find some enjoyment in the quiet things.
Batman's is... a few moments of peace and to do it all over again.
I can't tell if that's sad or not.
no subject
Date: 2024-05-15 12:44 am (UTC)I have griped about other stories that seem to conclude with "Ain't it great how the big characters will get rebooted forever?" and this story does flirt with being that towards its end. The difference is that Gaiman does have a profound thing or two to say about Batman--his indomitable spirit, his endless commitment/compulsion, shaping the lives of everyone around him, including his own. Gaiman at once recognizes that being Batman is a childish notion and that there's something sublime about it. "Your only reward for being Batman? You get to be Batman." Not Gaiman's best, for sure, but a worthy addition to his resume.